Two Faced Bankers

December 6, 2011


When it comes to bailouts, banks have enthusiastically flown the flag of their “home” country and displayed a particular fondness for their country’s generous taxpayers. But when it comes to making money, suddenly they remember that they are really citizens of the world not beholden to any one country and certainly not to any regulators. They are responsible only to their shareholders.

During the first global financial crisis, IKP was happy that it was a German citizen when both Federal and State governments came to its aid to the tune of €7.2 million to save it sinking into a sea of bad debts.  Similarly, UBS took comfort in its Swiss citizenship when the government handed over $5.3 billion and allowed it to transfer $60 billion of distressed assets to the government.  The bankrupt Anglo Irish danced a jig when it received $7 billion from the Irish government, while in the US, AIG flew the Stars & Stripes in appreciation of the generosity of the US government, which provided it with $85 billion in emergency loans.  Moreover, Kuwait, Netherlands, Australia, Austria and a number of other countries embraced their so-called national banks, providing guarantees against failure, all of which helped stave off runs by depositors.

Understandably, as the 2007 global financial crisis receded, governments around the world started to look at what they needed to do to prevent another crisis and protect themselves from bankers knocking on their door for future bailouts. Measures taken include requiring banks to hold more capital in reserve, which would cover any unexpected losses, and forcing greater transparency on their balance sheets, particularly in areas like derivatives, which were one of the financial products that exploded in the face of many unsuspecting bankers in 2007.

Four years after the last crisis and no longer red-faced at having been caught short or having to accept handouts, let alone showing any remorse for crippling the global financial system with their ill-judged risk-taking, bankers are aggressively resisting new regulations designed to prevent a repeat of the crisis.

As a result, efforts to introduce regulations have had mixed success, primarily due to the lobbying efforts by the very same banks that were in serious trouble during 2007 and 2008.

Suddenly, bankers remembered that they were citizens of the world and warned governments not to introduce stringent regulations, which would only put them at a competitive disadvantage with banks from other countries where they were lightly regulated.

In light of the current crisis in Europe, it’s interesting to note that some of the most aggressive lobbyists were the three major French banks – BNP Paribas SA, Société Générale SA and Crédit Agricole SA.  It now appears that these very same French banks have been hiding serious problems: foolish investments in Greek bonds.  To make matters worse, they have inadequate capital reserves to cover any write-downs.   Presumably, very soon they will remind the French government that it has an obligation to get them out of trouble.

A number of banks have not even bothered to lobby to get their way.  To avoid regulation by a particular country in which they operate, they have legally changed their local operation from a subsidiary, which is subject to local regulation, to a branch, which is not.

For example, earlier this year, Deutsche Bank’s Portuguese operation changed its status from a subsidiary to a branch. This decision coincided with the introduction of stricter bank regulations in Portugal.

These are the privileges of being a citizen of the world, and banks have used globalization to choose which jurisdictions and which country’s laws they prefer to operate under.

The solution is both ridiculously simple and fiendishly difficult to put in place. Countries need to stop treating banks as their own nationals and treat them as citizens of the world, which is what they really are. As citizens of the world, banks should be regulated as such, uniformly and with sufficient rigor to avoid future banking crises.

Unfortunately, no country would agree because they believe this would threaten their sovereignty.  In reality, international banks have used the globalization of capital markets to make a mockery of their sovereignty, so they have nothing to lose by cooperating with international rules but much if they don’t.

11 Comments for this entry

  • Terry O'Keefe says:

    Thanks for this. Yes, the bankers are two-faced. The recent reluctance by the Australian banks to pass on the rate cut is evidence.

    • While companies can move around as they please then they’ll always be able to find their way around regulations they don’t like. why can’t governments just get together and create one set of rules that applies to all corporations, wherever they may wish to operate?

      • Harry says:

        Carsten, governments are too worried about protecting their precious sovereignty to cooperate. As a result banks just skip around national regulations and have been doing so for the last 40 years.

  • Carol Evans says:

    I came, I read this article, I conquered.

  • George says:

    Banks are two faced. Always have been and I believe they always will be. This issue has unfortunately been around for too long. What what can we do about it?

  • Dino Chester says:

    Bankers being shifty. Now that’s news!

  • Jeff Zimmer says:

    There are just too many smart lawyers out there for bankers to employ to find there way around regulations. Why can’t the government find their own clever lawyers to right legislation that doesn’t allow for such loopholes.

  • Ian Orchard says:

    Your article is interesting. But, it appears to be US and EURO centric. What about the Canadian experience where banking regulations kept us out of the US slippery slope?
    The Bank of Montreal just offered a 5 year mortgage for 2.9%.

    • Harry says:

      Ian, you’re quite right in pointing out that a number of countries have avoided the problems faced in the US and Europe. This really supports my contention that strong regulations are the antidote to risky bank practices. However banks in Canada may still be at risk if they chose to get around national regulations by manipulating their legal status.

  • Ian Orchard says:

    http://www.ctv.ca/generic/generated/static/business/article2302349.html

    I think the above article ( link attached) summarizes the Canadian perspective.

    • Harry says:

      The link to the profile of Governor of the Bank of Canada, Mark Carney is an example of what I believe is missing with many central bankers – an understanding of how investment bankers can game the system and a willingness to regulate them to stop them exploiting loopholes. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Leave a Reply

Previous Post
«
partners:

Even more troubling, nearly sixteen million Americans must now travel at least thirty minutes or prada sunglasses for women more to reach a trauma center. Over the weekend prada sunglasses for women a new feature of Hulu was added - and then Cartier Sunglasses Men taken away. It is in light of this recently begun and still on-going exposure of the habitual and commonplace pederasty of priests that I find the Catholic Republican candidate for the Presidency's remarks about freedom of religion to be quite ingenuous. prada sunglasses for women Just recently I was told they finally found a prada sunglasses for women few bones after prada sunglasses for women many years of being buried in the sand. Although the fish were biting, I threw the boys in the car and raced down the canyon.

At some point, the crowd became restless and then they stormed forward, breaking down doors, tearing up papers and knocking over furniture. Cartier Sunglasses Men In addition to Assad stepping down and the observer mission continuing, the Arab League plan has called for the removal of heavy Cartier glasses weaponry out of the cities of Syria, including the capital, Damascus, an end on attacks on protesters, especially peaceful, unarmed protesters. During the observer's mission, nearly one thousand people were killed, including louis vuitton sunglasses women a large number of women