The Occupy Wall Street movement needs to move on from demonstrations to constructing a compelling narrative of what is wrong with globalization and capitalism.

Instead, the movement is bogged down in pursuing a long shopping list of grievances.

Anger and frustration have been major factors in driving the Occupied Wall Street movement, which arrived without warning and spread from Wall Street to other states and then elsewhere around the world, as public places were occupied in New York, Washington, Melbourne, Rio de Janeiro, Kuala Lumpur, Frankfurt and many other places around the world. To date, over 95 cities across 82 countries have joined in, illustrating that even protests against globalization are themselves globalized.

The underlying theme, below a cacophony of angry voices, is that capitalism and its offspring – globalization – are inherently unfair, favoring the 1% over the majority 99%. Getting a handle of exactly why protesters are so angry is not easy. Without a single voice or list of demands, beyond these two themes, protesters appear unfocused and confused to the outside world.

In the initial stages of the movement, the lack of focus has not been a problem. By occupying civic spaces, protesters have been able to attract public attention and media coverage, which served its purpose for the first few weeks. Then police and municipal authorities moved in to clear demonstrators out of public spaces. The story changed for the media, turning into accounts of running battles between the protesters and their evictors. The activists became obsessed with their right to occupy rather than seeing it as a means to publicize a broader agenda.

It’s pretty obvious that the movement has strayed from the issues that had brought them out into the streets in the first place and were loosing the opportunity of time in the media limelight to publicize a wider agenda are being lost.

When New York mayor Michael Bloomberg ordered police to remove occupiers out of Zuccotti Park on November 15, he told protesters, “Now they will have to occupy the space with the power of their arguments.” It was not surprising when protesters dissenters burst into gales of laughter. After all, Bloomberg is a billionaire several times over and the 12th richest person in the United States, and therefore, is very much part of the 1% against whom they were raging. Whatever his motives were in issuing this advice, it was nevertheless sound and should have been taken seriously.

Instead of taking Bloomberg’s advice, an ongoing battle followed in which occupiers returned to the park and were then evicted time and time again, fighting for space instead of values and ideas. Rather than doing the hard yards, and providing an analysis of what is wrong with globalization – and there is no lack of targets to hit – the Occupy Movement became a debate over whether banning camping of public land infringed free speech. Important, but unlikely, in itself to change the world or even to tell the world why capitalism and globalization needed reforming.

Perhaps, for the occupiers, this was the easy way out. It allowed the anger to continue and put off the day when they would have to go on to craft a second act – its own narrative on what is wrong with globalization and capitalism. Of course, this is harder work than coming up with  a few simplistic slogans, offering up bloodied faces to TV cameras, or being dragged by police out of their tents.

It’s interesting to compare the Occupy Movement to the Tea Party Movement in the US.  The Tea Party Movement also arose out of anger and frustration of the bailouts of US banks and the nationalization, or partial takeover of major businesses by the government. In the case of the Tea Party Movement, however, there was a second act, and there is every reason to believe that it is even moving onto a third act.

The second act was nurtured by right-wing think tanks, which have a strong presence in the US. They were able to provide the Tea Party Movement with a ready menu of reforms – small government, low taxes, deregulation and support of the free enterprise system.  So, what started out as colorful street protests, with participants dressing up in colonial garb, provided Tea Party protesters an opportunity to publicize their narrative about the problems of big government, unsustainable welfare programs and crony capitalism.

This platform has, in turn, been translated into political action as Tea Party candidates dominated the mid-term elections that now presidential Republican candidates fall all over themselves for their approval and support.

The Occupy Movement, which broadly covers the left, does not have the same luxury of a network of progressive think tanks ready to supply it with the narrative and solutions that will take it into a second act. This is both a lost opportunity and tragedy, as there is much wrong with globalization, which has been corrupted through special interests during its post-war history.  While the Occupy Movement stays on the street and engages in running battles with municipal police for the right to occupy public spaces, it won’t achieve that critical second act, let alone move onto a the third act where they achieve real change.

6 Comments for this entry

  • Harry,

    I would agree with you that those participating in the various forms of Occupy Wall street, seem to be without an agenda that could be argued by elected officials sympathetic to their overall cause. In a number of American cities the focus varies with local issues attached.

    One thing I found disturbing in this movement, at least in Atlanta, was the refusal by group members of allowing John Lewis, the last surviving member of the Martin Luther King-led group, the SCLC, a key Civil Rights-era group in that movement, and also, a U.S. Congressman to address a rally in that city. Just amazing!

    In New York, local Black leaders such as the controversial Reverend Al Sharpton, and Charles Barron, a radical City Councilman, were allowed to speak at various rallies in my hometown. So, the actions of those in Atlanta anyway, have not been repeated across the U.S.

    I still think that there will be a second act, and it will likely come out of New York, in large part because of the supportive actions of those in the Labor movement in that city. Leaders of the noted 1199 municipal union, and the Transit Workers Union of New York are not only sympathetic, but offering food and shelter and organizing space to the participants. This is certainly important as the Northern Hemisphere Winter kicks-in.

    And so, what happens in the next few weeks and months ahead of us will be important as this movement evolves. It will also be worth watching as to what moves various Black leaders in New York take in approaching the state of the ‘Occupiers.’ I do not have a crystal ball, nor do you. But, in spite of your view, and others in the U.S., such as Playthell Benjamin, a noted Black Intellectual and Leftist critic of this movement, do not see is the evolution of this new movement.

    Remember, the anti-Vietnam War activists in the early 1960’s were also called much the same names as these young people who are taking to the streets now. “End the war? But how?” That was the mantra of the day, until many more thousands became involved much later. The economic issues these folks are talking about, at least in the USA, are not about to go away anytime soon. Neither will the misery millions now endure each day in my homeland. There is no David Koch funding the’ Occupy’ movement in the USA, as was, and STILL is the case, of the Teabaggers.

    I am not planning or making a “Called Shot” on this, but this is still a movement worth watching. And watch it this writer will certainly do. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    -Eric

  • Owen Inglis says:

    It seems that while the OWS people have the medias attention they should do more to make their case. We’ve tried capitalism and it just doesn’t work.

  • It’s the return of the hippies, except that they now hang out around Wall Street instead of Haight-Ashbury.

  • Nat Mckee says:

    If only the Occupy movement could have the same impact on politics as the Tea Party, then we might see Congress shift to the left, not the right.

  • I agreed that Occupy movement needs a narrative. But is the movement sufficiently coherent to come up with a single compelling narrative.

Leave a Reply

partners:

Even more troubling, nearly sixteen million Americans must now travel at least thirty minutes or prada sunglasses for women more to reach a trauma center. Over the weekend prada sunglasses for women a new feature of Hulu was added - and then Cartier Sunglasses Men taken away. It is in light of this recently begun and still on-going exposure of the habitual and commonplace pederasty of priests that I find the Catholic Republican candidate for the Presidency's remarks about freedom of religion to be quite ingenuous. prada sunglasses for women Just recently I was told they finally found a prada sunglasses for women few bones after prada sunglasses for women many years of being buried in the sand. Although the fish were biting, I threw the boys in the car and raced down the canyon.

At some point, the crowd became restless and then they stormed forward, breaking down doors, tearing up papers and knocking over furniture. Cartier Sunglasses Men In addition to Assad stepping down and the observer mission continuing, the Arab League plan has called for the removal of heavy Cartier glasses weaponry out of the cities of Syria, including the capital, Damascus, an end on attacks on protesters, especially peaceful, unarmed protesters. During the observer's mission, nearly one thousand people were killed, including louis vuitton sunglasses women a large number of women