Safe Passage for Assange

August 23, 2012

In justifying the nuclear option – withdraw immunity from the Ecuadorian Embassy – the UK government claims, in a menacing letter it handed embassy staff,  that such protection is not available to harbour “alleged criminals, or frustrating the due legal process in a country”.

Recent history suggests that this is untrue.  In the UK, diplomats from Saudi Arabia and Sierra Leone were suspected of being involved in human trafficking, one from Saudi Arabia was accused of sexual assault, and a member of the Pakistan embassy was accused of issuing death threats.  None of these incidents resulted in the UK surrounding their embassies and demanding that the alleged perpetrator be surrendered.  Nor was there even a hint that embassy ground might be invaded to take them into custody. In all these cases, the UK did grant safe passage.

In Assange’s case, it seems that the rules of the game have been changed, as the UK government threatens to invade the Ecuadorian embassy to get its man.  While they are deciding whether to employ a battering ram, police have surrounded the embassy, so that they can grab Assange should he go out for a breath of fresh air.  And they have refused Assange safe passage out of the country.

2 Comments for this entry

  • Whilst I agree with you up to a point, wouldn’t the difference be that the two diplomats were already subject to diplomatic immunity prior to the alleged offences and that that status remained unchanged, whereas Assange has been granted virtual immunity only after the alleged offences took place.

    • Harry says:

      Technically you are right. But he way the UK framed its letter to the Ecuadorian embassy is that it would not tolerate the premises being used to harbor wrongdoers. It does not distinguish between those with diplomatic immunity and those without. It the case that triggered the legislation permitting immunity to be breached, the Iraqis that shot the policewomen probably did have immunity.

Leave a Reply


Even more troubling, nearly sixteen million Americans must now travel at least thirty minutes or prada sunglasses for women more to reach a trauma center. Over the weekend prada sunglasses for women a new feature of Hulu was added - and then Cartier Sunglasses Men taken away. It is in light of this recently begun and still on-going exposure of the habitual and commonplace pederasty of priests that I find the Catholic Republican candidate for the Presidency's remarks about freedom of religion to be quite ingenuous. prada sunglasses for women Just recently I was told they finally found a prada sunglasses for women few bones after prada sunglasses for women many years of being buried in the sand. Although the fish were biting, I threw the boys in the car and raced down the canyon.

At some point, the crowd became restless and then they stormed forward, breaking down doors, tearing up papers and knocking over furniture. Cartier Sunglasses Men In addition to Assad stepping down and the observer mission continuing, the Arab League plan has called for the removal of heavy Cartier glasses weaponry out of the cities of Syria, including the capital, Damascus, an end on attacks on protesters, especially peaceful, unarmed protesters. During the observer's mission, nearly one thousand people were killed, including louis vuitton sunglasses women a large number of women