New Pope’s murky past

March 15, 2013

By Andrew Self

Today the world woke up to its first Latin American and Jesuit pope. Although apparently being second choice behind the former pope Benedict when he was elected in 2005, Pope Francis I was seen as an outside chance this time round.

Argentine Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the archbishop of Buenos Aires, comes from the region with the most Catholics in the world.

There seems to be no doubt that he is austere, doctrinally solid, and with a proven track record in Church governance as Jesuit provincial, then auxiliary bishop and Cardinal Archbishop of Buenos Aires. Locally, the Argentine media speak of him with some respect due to his hard work with the poor, and consider him a strong social leader in a nation where politicians and other leaders are often regarded, possibly rightly so, in bad stead.

But there is very little on the public record about the man who now holds the Catholic Church’s highest post. It has been said he is modest, and prefers the local colectivos and trains in his travels to visit the large poor population of his diocese of more than 3 million people.

Yet it is his ties to the military dictatorship in Argentina that raises many questions both for Argentines and human rights campaigners globally. Argentina’s famous human rights campaigners the Madres de Plaza de Mayo have come out immediately condemning the appointment of this Pope.

The Catholic Church has a strong link to the darkest days in Argentine history: the period between 1976-1983 which saw the bloody repression of anyone considered subversive. Torture and killing was routine. In a damning book by journalist Horacio Verbitsky, El Silencio (Silence), he tells of how then Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio hid the dictatorship’s political prisoners from a delegation of the Inter-American Human Rights Commission.

And while many of his fellow Jesuits in the region have followed a more progressive line of liberation theology, Francis has not. He was prominent in the church during the brutal dictatorship of the 1970s, in which more than 30,000 people “disappeared”. He has been photographed with Jorge Videla, the military leader of the time. The Catholic Church in Argentina has long held very conservative tendencies but there were members of the Jesuit order who were involved in the “theology of liberation” and opposed the military government. Bergoglio was not. “After a war,” he was heard to say, “you have to act firmly.”

Argentine papers have reported that he was accused of having withdrawn his protection of two of his fellow Jesuits during the military dictatorship. Bergoglio said that shortly before the coup on March 24, 1976 he warned them of the danger and gave them both shelter in the house of the Jesuits.

But the two priests, Francisco Jalic and Orlando Dorio, who did social work in poor neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires, rejected this offer, according to Bergoglio. Two months later they were abducted by the military and held prisoner for five months in a secret detention centre.

Politically, Francis I is no friend of the left and was been a vocal critic of center-left former president Nestor Kirchner and current president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. He clashed with both on issues around gay marriage (which is legal in Argentina) and Fernandez de Kirchner has famously been absent at his public speeches, as often they were directed at her.

In 2010, he led the fight of what the archbishop called a “war of God” against the government, while trying by all means to prevent the passage of the law recognizing marriage between same sex couples. Bergoglio led demonstrations, mobilised priests in defense of the “family unit” and called for vigils outside parliament. “This is not just a political struggle, but it is a destructive claim to God’s plan,” he said.

After being repeatedly shunned by the government, Bergoglio has stated there is no relation between the church and the government in Argentina. Politically, he could be identified with the Peronist right in Argentina. He is a critic of free market neo-liberalism, but with authoritarian and socially conservative tendencies.

The decision by the Catholic hierarchy to move the center of gravity away from Europe for the first time is an interesting one. Nonetheless, Bergoglio has strong connections to Italy – his parents were Italian – and the conservative wing of the Catholic Church, so the choice to move geographically may not be as much of a leap as it appears. Brazilian candidate Odilo Scherer would have been a more “centrist” candidate who has a cleaner human rights record.

But without a doubt, the appointment of a Latin American Pope will put some of the pressing issues of an oft forgotten region – such as chronic poverty and inequality under an devastating global capitalist system – on the table.

Andrew Self (La Trobe University) does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. This article was originally published at The Conversation. Read the original article.

2 Comments for this entry

  • Neil B says:

    The media have been airing these issues and respected human right advocates from that time defend him and some fault him. He is a social activist but morally conservative but reaches out the transgressors. Some say he is basically Peronist. He took a cab to conclave…

    That is all I know, except that he makes the rich President Cristina Kirchner uncomfortable … she made her money foreclosing on loans to old homeowners!

  • QT says:

    I see in the newspapers today that the Vatican has refuted allegations of complicity with human rights abuses during the “dirty war”. What can be said about Francis 1 is he is hostile to unrestrained capitalism. In November 2000, when he was simply archbishop Jorge Bergoglio, he issued a statement that blasted the “growing gap between rich and poor,” the “negative aspects of globalization,” and “the tyranny of the markets.”

    “We live in world in which the primacy of economics, without a base of reference in…the common good, impedes the resurgence of many nations,” he pontificated. “To accustom ourselves to living in a world of exclusion and inequality is a serious moral failure that erodes the dignity of mankind and compromises peace and social harmony.”

Leave a Reply

partners:

Even more troubling, nearly sixteen million Americans must now travel at least thirty minutes or prada sunglasses for women more to reach a trauma center. Over the weekend prada sunglasses for women a new feature of Hulu was added - and then Cartier Sunglasses Men taken away. It is in light of this recently begun and still on-going exposure of the habitual and commonplace pederasty of priests that I find the Catholic Republican candidate for the Presidency's remarks about freedom of religion to be quite ingenuous. prada sunglasses for women Just recently I was told they finally found a prada sunglasses for women few bones after prada sunglasses for women many years of being buried in the sand. Although the fish were biting, I threw the boys in the car and raced down the canyon.

At some point, the crowd became restless and then they stormed forward, breaking down doors, tearing up papers and knocking over furniture. Cartier Sunglasses Men In addition to Assad stepping down and the observer mission continuing, the Arab League plan has called for the removal of heavy Cartier glasses weaponry out of the cities of Syria, including the capital, Damascus, an end on attacks on protesters, especially peaceful, unarmed protesters. During the observer's mission, nearly one thousand people were killed, including louis vuitton sunglasses women a large number of women